-=| gregor herrmann, Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 03:41:26AM +0100 |=- > On Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:55:33 +0100, gregor herrmann wrote: > > * What shall we do about the "trailing part" ('debian uupdate' or > > similar)? It's hardly used, and I'd personally prefer to remove it > > to get more consistency but there might be others who actually > > like/use it. I drop this when I see it too. When I get to review a package, "uscan --force --rename" is the first thing I do after "svn update" and if it fires up uupdate or svn-upgrade or whatever I am a bit surprised. I find the hook useful when the upstream source needs to be repackaged for some reason. Yes, I know of at least one DD in the group that uses that hook with svn-upgrade, but as he uploads the packages by himeslf, I got no chance to remove it :) About the "policy", I think that it is sufficient that dh-make-perl uses what is considered "widely accepted" and be done with it. Writing down every bit of dh-make-perl templates in a "policy" with the note that "packages differ and deviations are possible" seems like duplicated work to me. -- dam JabberID: dam@jabber.minus273.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature