Re: Bug#458143: libpod-simple-perl FTBFS with perl from experimental
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 02:40:52AM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
>BTW: Is there a timetable for the introduction of perl 5.10 in
>unstable?
No specific timetable.
The initial plan was to stuff packages into experimental and get the
autobuilders working on them.
At the same time, allow people to test building modules and programs
embedding perl looking for show-stoppers.
The next step will be to push the packages to unstable, get them
installed onto the buildds and tickle binary NMUs for all packages which
depend on perlapi-5.8.x .
If a significant number of XS modules will fail to binNMU due to this
rmdir issue, then that last step can wait a bit.
--bod
Reply to: