On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:46:27 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 12:11:04PM +0000, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > > * add a note to the changelog (in such a manner that it can't be missed > > by the sponsor) warning of the changes. > > Next, the sponsoring DD decides and either > > a) removes the note, cleans Uploaders and uploads the package > I'm also unsure if it's really necessary to remove the note. > Isn't just a regular entry in the changelog enough? The sponsor > is supposed to check the package thoroughly in any case. I think a regular changelog entry is appropriate but a LARGE changelog NOTE is helpful for everyone (as it's used now for other comments directed to others). > Is there any sense in the 'official' pkg-perl DM list I suggested? > Would it help the sponsoring DDs to decide which Uploader additions they > approve, without having to consider it (and list grounds for rejections) > on a case-by-case basis? That's a question for DDs, my pragmatical point of view is that it's not really necessary for the probably very small group of DMs in the pkg-perl group. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature