On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 11:26:52AM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Damyan Ivanov dijo [Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 03:45:19PM +0300]:
> > I am wondering, shouldn't the contents of bin/ be included in the
> > package somehow? For example, bin/wwwshell.pl as usr/bin/wwwshell and
> > the others somewhere in usr/share/doc/$pkg/examples?
> > That would require writing a man page for wwwshell, though.
> > The point is, that the whole purpose of the package is to provide easy
> > access to the WWW::Mechanize facilities via a shell-like environment,
> > even the package contains "-shell-" in its name, but the promised
> > shell-like environment is not available easily.
> Umh... How would you feel about putting this in a separate binary
> package? Would make sense...
I dont't want to have a single line executable in a seperate package.
Opening a shell is as simple as `perl -MWWW::Mechanize::Shell -eshell`.
Guess everybody who wants to use it will find it either in examples or in
manpages or in perldoc.
> Gunnar Wolf - email@example.com - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
> PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
> Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF