[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: by-author vs. by-module URLs in debian/watch



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

- -=| Bart Martens,  5.08.2007 14:48 |=-
> Another reason for why not: The directories "by-module" seem to lag
> behind.  For example:
> 
> These have version 0.9:
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/libc/libclass-dbi-pg-perl.html
> http://search.cpan.org/~dmaki/Class-DBI-Pg/
> 
> But here the newest version is 0.8:
> http://cpan.org/modules/by-module/Class/
> 
> I have not yet scanned all Perl modules in Debian to see how big this
> problem at CPAN is.

Ouch! Existence of such exceptions makes the whole idea of using only
by-module URLs inappropriate.

I guess the most authoritative source of module version information
would be http://search.cpan.org/searcg?query=$module&mode=module but
using this for all 360 DPG packages would be dead slow.

> I'm not part of the group, but I'm so arrogant to push my thoughts here
> anyway. :)

Your input is valuable. Thanks!

> I think that a "per package" approach is best, so a debian/watch file
> per package with "by-module" or with "authors/id" depending on what fits
> best for the package.  I think however that "by-module" is a very
> reasonable general default.

This pretty much is the current state and I agree it is a reasonable
approach. Perhaps we can move to by-module-is-preferred approach, but
only after making sure this does more good than harm.
- --
Damyan Ivanov            JabberID: dam@jabber.minus273.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGthM6Hqjlqpcl9jsRAoMwAJ0aZX3ycEaJUIvXreiksrHhisHTCwCgxdhx
CFd8fFRqtPcxCVXFQ6X/8wM=
=Q81k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: