On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:59:21 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > attic/ # moved from packages/attic, otherwise left as-is > Quick question: Being this SVN and not CVS, is it really worthy to > have an attic? Yes, I know it will be easier to access than just > erasing what we are not doing anymore, and that's a strong > point... But it might be worth pondering just to 'svn remove' what we > don't need anymore. I have no strong opinion about attic/; as I never used it after moving packages there it's probably not really helpful. > Besides that... Go, Joey, go! :) Ack; although I have to admit that I'd like to see a fixed svn-inject (or a documented workaround) before the actual switch. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `- NP: The Doors: Riders On The Storm
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature