[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Subversion repository layout

On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 10:59:21 -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:

> > attic/		# moved from packages/attic, otherwise left as-is
> Quick question: Being this SVN and not CVS, is it really worthy to
> have an attic? Yes, I know it will be easier to access than just
> erasing what we are not doing anymore, and that's a strong
> point... But it might be worth pondering just to 'svn remove' what we
> don't need anymore.

I have no strong opinion about attic/; as I never used it after
moving packages there it's probably not really helpful.
> Besides that... Go, Joey, go!  :)

Ack; although I have to admit that I'd like to see a fixed svn-inject
(or a documented workaround) before the actual switch.

 .''`.   http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4
 : :' :  debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/
 `. `'   member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/
   `-    NP: The Doors: Riders On The Storm

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: