On Tue, 17 Jul 2007 15:00:35 -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > > Heh, so it was not only me who found this thing to be attractive and > > interesting ;-) Joey, please pseak up: What do you propose? > This is my proposal for the layout: Looks good to me. [..] > attic/ # moved from packages/attic, otherwise left as-is [..] Yup, outside packages makes life easier (says he who placed it there in the first place :-P). > FWIW, this avoids most of svn-buildpackage's bugs with this style of repo > layout. (Except for the svn-inject -l 2 bug.) I hope that will be fixed soon. > Switching to this layout could work as follows: Sounds good. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. http://info.comodo.priv.at/ | gpg key ID: 0x00F3CFE4 : :' : debian: the universal operating system - http://www.debian.org/ `. `' member of https://www.vibe.at/ | how to reply: http://got.to/quote/ `- NP: Tracy Chapman: Open Arms
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature