Re: Lintian reports for etch
Carlo Segre <segre@iit.edu> writes:
> There are a lot of lintian warnings for our packages
> http://merkel.debian.org/~ballombe/lintian-etch-i386/reports/mDebian_Perl_Group.html
> What is the consensus about fixing these for etch? If we do decide to
> clean up, what priority shall we put on the new uploads and will we
> overwhelm the release managers?
> My inclination is to fix them but not insist for etch unless there is a
> particularly bad one.
At this point, unless it's a translation update or an RC bug, it probably
shouldn't go into etch. For Perl modules, it's probably safe to upload
fixed packages to unstable, but personally I've been generally holding all
of my uploads except for etch-targetted work until after etch releases.
--
Russ Allbery (rra@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: