Re: [Fwd: Bug#295967: libnet-irc-perl: wrongly installed documentation]
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:08:37 +0100, Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi Debian Perl Group,
>
> I just had a look at this bug, but the Makefile.PL looks fine to me. Is
> this a bug in ExtUtils::MakeMaker, or what is the problem?
>
> Greetings,
> nomeata
> --
> Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
> Debian Developer
> nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
> JID: joachimbreitner@amessage.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Attila Kinali <attila@kinali.ch>
> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
> Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:46:40 +0100
> Subject: Bug#295967: libnet-irc-perl: wrongly installed documentation
> Package: libnet-irc-perl
> Version: 0.75-1
> Severity: normal
>
> The documentation of Net::IRC::{Event|Connection|DCC}
> are installed as man Net::{Event|Connection|DCC} which
> is not the place mentioned in man Net::IRC
>
> I guess this should be corrected
>
> Attila Kinali
>
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 3.1
> APT prefers testing
> APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
> Architecture: i386 (i686)
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-swsusp.2.1.5
> Locale: LANG=de_CH, LC_CTYPE=de_CH (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
>
> Versions of packages libnet-irc-perl depends on:
> ii perl 5.8.4-5 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
>
> -- no debconf information
>
> _______________________________________________
> pkg-perl-maintainers mailing list
> pkg-perl-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-perl-maintainers
>
>
>
Sorry if I'm going off your topic here, but might I suggest POE::Component::IRC?
It is a whole lot more stable and, from what I've seen of Net::IRC
it's also alot less buggy overall.
IMHO the documentation is also superior to that of Net::IRC
POE in itself is also sweet and well worth learning if you're yet to do so.
http://poe.perl.org/
the Debian package is libpoe-component-irc-perl
--
Fredrik "Demonen" Vold
Reply to: