[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#236429: Patch - NMUing as well



On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 05:30:40PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > Gunnar, if you would like to put this in incoming instead of delayed,
> > please feel free to do so.  Also if either you or Marc would like to
> > add yourselves as co-maintainers for this package (so you can close
> > things like this with your upload etc.) then you'd be quite welcome
> > to do so if you have a continued interest in this package.
> 
> Ummm... I am not currently using this package, I made this NMU because
> it sounded trivial (although, I must admit by now, I goofed with the
> build-dependencies :-/ ). I don't think I would make the best
> maintainer for this - However, instead of letting it fall behind, this
> module can be placed in the hands of Debian's Perl group [1]. See also
> the group's goals [2].

Yes, I spoke to them when they were first announced, but I believe they
have (had?) enough of their own work to do for a while.  I'm happy to keep
the package to keep it from being orphaned, because as you say it is
quite trivial, and seldom has bugs other than 'new upstream'.

I made the offer about co-maintainer because IIRC you've shown an
interest in it before and that would let you close bugs and the like
without having to have it dropped in your lap as your primary
responsibility.

If you're not sure what I mean by co-maintainer, see, er, the developers
reference I think.  It's now a recognised role.

thanks anyway,
Ron




Reply to: