Re: dh_perl
On Sat, 1 Feb 2003, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Feb 2003, Joey Hess wrote:
> > an up-to-date package database available. And to really do this right
> > you probably need a layer of indirection with room for maintainer
> > overrides as the shlibs files provide for automated shared library
> > dependency calculation.
>
> Is there a reason why we don't have something like a shlibs file for perl?
> It *would* come in handy, and tools such as dh_perl could make use of it.
Or python, or java, or any other advanced interpretive type language.
Reply to: