Re: Can't locate re.pm in @INC. Move re module to perl-5.00*-base ??
>>>Darren Stalder wrote:
> Achim Bohnet <firstname.lastname@example.org>, in an immanent manifestation of deity, wrote:
> >bash-2.02$ dpkg --search File/Basename
> >pperl-5.004-base: /usr/lib/perl5/5.004/File/Basename.pm
> >perl-5.005-base: /usr/lib/perl5/5.005/File/Basename.pm
> >bash-2.02$ grep 'use re' /usr/lib/perl5/5.00*/File/Basename.pm
> >/usr/lib/perl5/5.004/File/Basename.pm:use re 'taint';
> >/usr/lib/perl5/5.005/File/Basename.pm:use re 'taint';
> >So should
> > o re module be moved from perl-5.00* to perl-5.00*-base package?
> > o perl-5.00*-base recommend/require perl-5.00* instead of suggesting it?
> > o this be declared as a know feature?
> This means that re.pm should be moved to perl-5\d+-base. So, has anyone
> done any localization. We don't need all the autoloaded POSIX functions
> in base....
I did a quick grep this morning in the .pm files of perl-5.005-base
and found two more potential problems:
File::Path uses DirHandle
FileHandle requires IO::File
This list may be incomplete (only perl can parse perl :)
If you live in the European Union and you don't like spam then
support the petition:
Vote against Spam! http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/