Re: What to do with a '.pm' that has to be customized?
- To: debian-perl@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: What to do with a '.pm' that has to be customized?
- From: Chip Salzenberg <chip@perlsupport.com>
- Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 20:45:50 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 19990704204550.C31091@perlsupport.com>
- In-reply-to: <19990629091726.A7403@drow.res.cmu.edu>; from Daniel Jacobowitz on Tue, Jun 29, 1999 at 09:17:26AM -0400
- References: <199906291247.OAA06313@ezili.sis.pasteur.fr> <19990629091726.A7403@drow.res.cmu.edu>
According to Daniel Jacobowitz:
> On Tue, Jun 29, 1999 at 02:47:07PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > 3) Rewrite the module to have it 'use' the real conffile, in /etc/bioperl...
> > Difficult (especially if the upstream maintainer does not want to integrate my
> > patches) but cleaner.
>
> I strongly recommend the third option. If nothing else, you can do
> this by putting that .pm in /etc/bioperl/site.pm [...]
A side point: Would that name comply with the policy on the naming of
subdirs of /etc?
--
Chip Salzenberg - a.k.a. - <chip@perlsupport.com>
"When do you work?" "Whenever I'm not busy."
Reply to: