Re: Discussing Successor of Debian SSO Service
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018, Himanshu Shekhar wrote:
> Thanks Dashamir for review.
>
> After going through the list, Keycloak <https://keycloak.org> was something
> which impressed me. I shall give it a try sometime.
> However, all of them do a lot of work and are much configurable. I wanted
> to develop something with sensible defaults and fewer customizations.
> It should not be dealing with authorization (neither RBAC, UBAC, nor LDAP
> etc.). It should deal with only the authentication part.
>
> That's my opinion. Debian might have its own set of requirements.
>
> Well, I would still want to figure out why the same is available on the
> ideas page. Are there any specific requirements which are not fulfilled by
> current tools?
> Alexander, are you on this list?
Yes, I am, but I am not sure what exactly do you mean with "current tools"?
There aren't any tools implementing its own backend, self user management and
oauth2.
Alex
Reply to: