[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Kanboard and alternatives for mentoring



Hello

El 16/02/18 a las 10:30, Daniel Pocock escribió:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The DebConf team is running kanban.debian.net
> 
> We weren't sure if that is open to Outreachy and GSoC so Paulo kindly
> set up an instance at kanban.softwarelivre.org for Renata's project:
> 
> https://kanban.softwarelivre.org/?controller=BoardViewController&action=readonly&token=5e753bdc0023a5ae54bec401ca407a3dc642e9a0c10f8e56da6a77e25300
> 
> Have other mentors used similar things?
> 
> Would anybody like to share the instance used by DebConf or setup
> another instance as a standard tool for Outreachy?
> 
> Or would anybody propose an alternative tool for the next round?
> 

There are two kanban webapps already available in storm.debian.net (a Sandstorm
instance): Scrumblr and Wekan.

In 2015 I created one document of each, available for tests and playgrounds, for
the DebConf team:

Test Scrumblr: http://deb.li/testscrum
Test Wekan : http://deb.li/testwekan

The other team members concluded that these apps were too "simple" for help
organising a DebConf (and then, deployed their kanban instance), but I think
they may be useful for smaller projects as GSoC/Outreachy.

The tests are still online, if anybody wants to try and play with them.

If anybody needs/wants access to storm.debian.net or their user has not enough
privileges to create new grains (one grain is a "document" of a certain app,
e.g. a wekan board, or an etherpad, or a framadate poll...), just ping me by
mail or IRC and I'll attend the request ASAP.

Cheers

-- 
Laura Arjona Reina
https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona


> Note that my project proposal for a client-side Kanban board[1] is not
> related to this question - that would still depend on a server side
> solution anyway, unless an intern could track all their issues in the BTS.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Daniel
> 
> 
> 
> 1.
> https://danielpocock.com/worlds-largest-kanban-board-with-free-software-communities
> 


Reply to: