[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1065448: marked as done (libreoffice-common: soffice builds of pdf files are unreproducible)



Your message dated Thu, 7 Aug 2025 22:12:16 +0000
with message-id <c8439a62c7124915ba64edde6bc8d5df@franceagrimer.fr>
and subject line RE: Notice!!
has caused the Debian Bug report #1065448,
regarding libreoffice-common: soffice builds of pdf files are unreproducible
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1065448: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065448
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---

Package: libreoffice-common
Version: 4:24.2.0-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: peter@pblackman.plus.com

Dear Maintainer,

When creating pdf files from odt files, soffice writes a CreationDate field
which contains the actual build date/time. This varies with every build.
For an example, see the bottom of
https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/rb-pkg/trixie/amd64/diffoscope-results/winff.html

soffice could use the creation date of the input odt file,
or even SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH instead of the current system date.

Regards,
Peter


-- Package-specific info:
Configuration file                            Package Exists Changed
/etc/libreoffice/registry/Langpack-en-US.xcd  libreoffice-common Yes     No
/etc/libreoffice/registry/lingucomponent.xcd  libreoffice-common Yes     No
/etc/libreoffice/registry/main.xcd            libreoffice-common Yes     No
/etc/libreoffice/registry/pdfimport.xcd       libreoffice-common Yes     No
/etc/libreoffice/registry/res/fcfg_langpack_e libreoffice-common Yes     No
/etc/libreoffice/registry/xsltfilter.xcd      libreoffice-common Yes     No

-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 6.6.15-amd64 (SMP w/12 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages libreoffice-common depends on:
ii  libnumbertext-data           1.0.11-4
ii  libreoffice-style-colibre    4:24.2.0-1
ii  libreoffice-uiconfig-common  4:24.2.0-1
ii  ucf                          3.0043+nmu1
ii  ure                          4:24.2.0-1

Versions of packages libreoffice-common recommends:
ii  apparmor            3.0.12-1+b2
ii  fonts-liberation    1:2.1.5-3
ii  libexttextcat-data  3.4.7-1
ii  poppler-data        0.4.12-1
ii  python3-uno         4:24.2.0-1
ii  xdg-utils           1.1.3-4.1

Versions of packages libreoffice-common suggests:
ii  libreoffice-style-colibre [libreoffice-style]  4:24.2.0-1
pn  python3-scriptforge                            <none>

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---

 

 

From: HUGOT Léonor
Sent: Friday, August 8, 2025 5:41 AM
To: HUGOT Léonor <leonor.hugot@franceagrimer.fr>
Subject: Notice!!

 

Humanitarian Grant of 1.5M for you. Reply for claims 


--- End Message ---

Reply to: