[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#825650: marked as done (libreoffice-common: prompting due to modified conffiles which were not modified by the user: /etc/libreoffice/sofficerc)

Your message dated Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:53:46 +0000
with message-id <[🔎] E1rx3rG-00E477-S5@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1069123: Removed package(s) from experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #825650,
regarding libreoffice-common: prompting due to modified conffiles which were not modified by the user: /etc/libreoffice/sofficerc
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
825650: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825650
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: libreoffice-common
Version: 1:5.1.3-1
Severity: serious
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts

Hi,

during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed the piuparts
upgrade test because dpkg detected a conffile as being modified and then
prompted the user for an action. As there is no user input, this fails.
But this is not the real problem, the real problem is that this prompt
shows up in the first place, as there was nobody modifying this conffile
at all, the package has just been installed and upgraded...

This is a violation of policy 10.7.3, see
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.7.3,
which says "[These scripts handling conffiles] must not ask unnecessary
questions (particularly during upgrades), and must otherwise be good
citizens."

https://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling should help with figuring
out how to do this properly.

In https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/08/msg00675.html and
followups it has been agreed that these bugs are to be filed with
severity serious.

>From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):

  Setting up libreoffice-common (1:5.1.3-1) ...
  
  Configuration file '/etc/libreoffice/sofficerc'
   ==> Modified (by you or by a script) since installation.
   ==> Package distributor has shipped an updated version.
     What would you like to do about it ?  Your options are:
      Y or I  : install the package maintainer's version
      N or O  : keep your currently-installed version
        D     : show the differences between the versions
        Z     : start a shell to examine the situation
   The default action is to keep your current version.
  *** sofficerc (Y/I/N/O/D/Z) [default=N] ? dpkg: error processing package libreoffice-common (--configure):
   end of file on stdin at conffile prompt

This was observed on an upgrade from squeeze (openoffice) =>
wheezy (libreoffice) => jessie => stretch. Only the last step
(jessie->stretch) failed.


cheers,

Andreas

Attachment: openoffice.org-common_None.log.gz
Description: application/gzip


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 4:24.2.3~rc1-1+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package libreoffice has just been removed from the Debian archive
experimental we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/1069123

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using https://snapshot.debian.org/.

Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and
will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the
earliest.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---
Reply to: