[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#994757: libgraphite2-dev: no archive files for static compilation are included in the -dev package



notfound 994757 1.3.13-11

severity 994757 wishlist

thanks

Hi,

Am 20.09.21 um 16:43 schrieb Alfonso Sanchez-Beato:
> Package: libgraphite2-dev
> Version: 1.3.13-11build1

There is no such version. You are reporting against Debian, please use
proper versions existing there.


Also you are reporting against a obsolete version which doesn't exist
anymore (and in stable stuff like this won't be changed):

$ rmadison libgraphite2-dev

libgraphite2-dev | 1.3.13-7        | oldstable       | amd64, arm64,
armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
libgraphite2-dev | 1.3.14-1        | stable          | amd64, arm64,
armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
libgraphite2-dev | 1.3.14-1        | testing         | amd64, arm64,
armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
libgraphite2-dev | 1.3.14-1        | unstable        | amd64, arm64,
armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x

> There is no libgraphite2.a file, so it is not possible to compile statically
> against this library. 
Because upstream doesn't build one in their standard build and I didn't
bother to manually build it as in your patch ...
> See attached patch to solve this.
.. as I am not sure. Why would people want to statically build against

libgraphite2.a anyways?

> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: bullseye/sid
>   APT prefers focal-updates
>   APT policy: (500, 'focal-updates'), (500, 'focal-security'), (500, 'focal'), (100, 'focal-backports')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> Foreign Architectures: i386

Ah, this explains it. If you use Ubuntu please do some care to make a correct Debian bug report.


Regards,


Rene


Reply to: