Bug#994757: libgraphite2-dev: no archive files for static compilation are included in the -dev package
notfound 994757 1.3.13-11
severity 994757 wishlist
thanks
Hi,
Am 20.09.21 um 16:43 schrieb Alfonso Sanchez-Beato:
> Package: libgraphite2-dev
> Version: 1.3.13-11build1
There is no such version. You are reporting against Debian, please use
proper versions existing there.
Also you are reporting against a obsolete version which doesn't exist
anymore (and in stable stuff like this won't be changed):
$ rmadison libgraphite2-dev
libgraphite2-dev | 1.3.13-7 | oldstable | amd64, arm64,
armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
libgraphite2-dev | 1.3.14-1 | stable | amd64, arm64,
armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
libgraphite2-dev | 1.3.14-1 | testing | amd64, arm64,
armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
libgraphite2-dev | 1.3.14-1 | unstable | amd64, arm64,
armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
> There is no libgraphite2.a file, so it is not possible to compile statically
> against this library.
Because upstream doesn't build one in their standard build and I didn't
bother to manually build it as in your patch ...
> See attached patch to solve this.
.. as I am not sure. Why would people want to statically build against
libgraphite2.a anyways?
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: bullseye/sid
> APT prefers focal-updates
> APT policy: (500, 'focal-updates'), (500, 'focal-security'), (500, 'focal'), (100, 'focal-backports')
> Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
> Foreign Architectures: i386
Ah, this explains it. If you use Ubuntu please do some care to make a correct Debian bug report.
Regards,
Rene
Reply to: