Bug#980013: libreoffice fails throwing com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException

[Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>]

tag 980013 + moreinfo

tag 980013 + unreproducible

thanks


Hi,

Am 12.01.21 um 22:54 schrieb Nick Bailey:
> access("/tmp", W_OK)                    = 0
> getuid()                                = 1000
> socket(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0)         = 3
> fcntl(3, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC)           = 0
> connect(3, {sa_family=AF_UNIX, sun_path="/tmp/OSL_PIPE_1000_SingleOfficeIPC_e68685edcbca78b5debcd31a7a395fac"}, 110) = -1 ECONNREFUSED (Connection refused)
> close(3)                                = 0
> stat("/proc/version", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0444, st_size=0, ...}) = 0
> stat("/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=20480, ...}) = 0
> openat(AT_FDCWD, "/sys/dev/block/254:0/queue/rotational", O_RDONLY) = 3
> close(3)                                = 0
Which is normal tht
> The named OSL_PIPE is left in /tmp after the program fails.
>
> This behaviour has arisen after (but not immediately after) upgrading
> the installation from Buster to Bullseye. 
But?
> I cannot find any left-over packages
> from the old installation.

I can find brokeness in your installation.


Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE


Nvidia crap?


> Versions of packages libreoffice-core recommends:
> ii  gstreamer1.0-libav         1:1.14.4-dmo3
[...]
> ii  gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly  1:1.14.4-dmo2

Sigh, dmo.



> Versions of packages libreoffice-writer depends on:
> ii  libabw-0.1-1             0.1.3-1
> ii  libc6                    2.31-9
> ii  libe-book-0.1-1          0.1.3-2
> ii  libepubgen-0.1-1         0.1.1-1
> ii  libetonyek-0.1-1         0.1.9-4
> ii  libgcc-s1                10.2.1-3
> ii  libicu67                 67.1-5
> ii  libmwaw-0.3-3            0.3.17-1
> ii  libodfgen-0.1-1          0.1.7-1
> ii  libreoffice-base-core    1:7.0.4-3
> ii  libreoffice-common       1:7.0.4-3
> ii  libreoffice-core         1:7.0.4-3
> pn  librevenge-0.0-0         <none>
[...]
> pn  libwpd-0.10-10           <none>
> pn  libwpg-0.3-3             <none>

How on earth did you get into a situation where a dependency is not
there? Did you force it's removal of what?


Anyways, just works for me, and for gazillions of other people since if
it was a real problem a report would have been there far earlier.


Regards,


Rene