Bug#993449: libreoffice-calc: Top level tool menu is missing text labels and icons for most buttons
"Great" attitude Rene, I must say, ever heard about "politeness"?
Anyways:
What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)? Just starting LibreOffice Calc or Write.
* What was the outcome of this action? All of tool bar buttons
display neither text nor icon, just blank space-holders.
* What outcome did you expect instead? Normal toolbar buttons with
icons/text on them.
To reproduce: just switch to "breeze-dark" style in Gnome using Gnome
Tweaks tool, then start LibreOffice.
A workaround is to force regular breeze icons in LibreOffice "options"
instead of "automatic, which is default .
Same issue exists in the next version of LibreOffice in "testing".
On Wed, 1 Sep 2021 18:11:06 +0200 Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org> wrote:
> severity 993449 important
> tag 993449 + moreinfo
> tag 993449 + unreproducible
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> Am Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 09:56:22AM -0500 schrieb pavel:
> > Package: libreoffice-calc
> > Version: 1:7.0.4-4
> > Severity: critical
> > Justification: breaks the whole system
>
> Bulls*.
>
> How does it break booting? How does it break other parts of
> the system?
>
> If at all, it'd be "grave".
>
> Read the bug definitions and don't submit overinflated bug reports.
>
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: paul_deg@yahoo.com
> >
> > Dear Maintainer,
> >
> > *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where
appropriate ***
> >
> > * What led up to the situation?
> > * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
> > ineffective)?
> > * What was the outcome of this action?
> > * What outcome did you expect instead?
> >
> > *** End of the template - remove these template lines ***
>
> Yes. Do. That's not there just for fun.
> No text here is no real good sign of anything.
>
> Anyways, your mail subject says
>
> Subject: Re: Bug#993449: libreoffice-calc: Top level tool menu is missing
> text labels and icons for most buttons
>
> You should haver added some explanation here....
>
> In any case:
>
> Oh, surprise. Works here fine. (and yes, I tried with gen(eric), gtk3,
> qt5 and kde5).
>
> So this is even unreproducible.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rene
>
>
Reply to: