[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#943401: libreoffice: Autopkgtests are failing since 2019-10-21



On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 04:10:57PM +0300, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> As can be seen on [1], the autopkgtests started failing this Monday and

WTF? Did you even read the output?

Most of the failures since last monday was guess what? Test
dependencies uninstallable because of exactly your Qt transition and the
failure of scheduling bin-NMUs in time so that this does not happen.

>From the first failing log:

Investigating (0) libkf5xmlgui-dev:amd64 < none -> 5.62.0-1 @un uN Ib >
Broken libkf5xmlgui-dev:amd64 Depends on libkf5xmlgui5:amd64 < none | 5.62.0-1 @un uH > (= 5.62.0-1)
  Considering libkf5xmlgui5:amd64 0 as a solution to libkf5xmlgui-dev:amd64 1
  Holding Back libkf5xmlgui-dev:amd64 rather than change libkf5xmlgui5:amd64
Investigating (0) libkf5bookmarks5:amd64 < none -> 5.62.0-1 @un uN Ib >
Broken libkf5bookmarks5:amd64 Depends on libkf5xmlgui5:amd64 < none | 5.62.0-1 @un uH > (>= 4.96.0)
  Considering libkf5xmlgui5:amd64 0 as a solution to libkf5bookmarks5:amd64 1
  Holding Back libkf5bookmarks5:amd64 rather than change libkf5xmlgui5:amd64
Investigating (0) libkf5kio-dev:amd64 < none -> 5.62.1-2 @un uN Ib >
Broken libkf5kio-dev:amd64 Depends on libkf5xmlgui-dev:amd64 < none | 5.62.0-1 @un uH > (>= 5.62.0~)
  Considering libkf5xmlgui-dev:amd64 1 as a solution to libkf5kio-dev:amd64 0
  Holding Back libkf5kio-dev:amd64 rather than change libkf5xmlgui-dev:amd64
Investigating (0) libkf5textwidgets5:amd64 < none -> 5.62.0-1 @un uN Ib >
Broken libkf5textwidgets5:amd64 Depends on libqt5texttospeech5:amd64 < none | 5.11.3-3 @un uH > (>= 5.8.0~alpha)
  Considering libqt5texttospeech5:amd64 0 as a solution to libkf5textwidgets5:amd64 0
  Holding Back libkf5textwidgets5:amd64 rather than change libqt5texttospeech5:amd64
Investigating (0) libkf5kiofilewidgets5:amd64 < none -> 5.62.1-2 @un uN Ib >
Broken libkf5kiofilewidgets5:amd64 Depends on libkf5bookmarks5:amd64 < none | 5.62.0-1 @un uH > (>= 4.96.0)
  Considering libkf5bookmarks5:amd64 1 as a solution to libkf5kiofilewidgets5:amd64 0
  Holding Back libkf5kiofilewidgets5:amd64 rather than change libkf5bookmarks5:amd64
Investigating (0) libkf5bookmarks-dev:amd64 < none -> 5.62.0-1 @un uN Ib >
Broken libkf5bookmarks-dev:amd64 Depends on libkf5bookmarks5:amd64 < none | 5.62.0-1 @un uH > (= 5.62.0-1)
  Considering libkf5bookmarks5:amd64 1 as a solution to libkf5bookmarks-dev:amd64 0
  Holding Back libkf5bookmarks-dev:amd64 rather than change libkf5bookmarks5:amd64
Investigating (0) autopkgtest-satdep:amd64 < 0 @iU mK Nb Ib >
Broken autopkgtest-satdep:amd64 Depends on libkf5kio-dev:amd64 < none | 5.62.1-2 @un uH >
  Considering libkf5kio-dev:amd64 0 as a solution to autopkgtest-satdep:amd64 -2
  Removing autopkgtest-satdep:amd64 rather than change libkf5kio-dev:amd64
Investigating (1) libkf5textwidgets-dev:amd64 < none -> 5.62.0-1 @un uN Ib >
Broken libkf5textwidgets-dev:amd64 Depends on libkf5textwidgets5:amd64 < none | 5.62.0-1 @un uH > (= 5.62.0-1)
  Considering libkf5textwidgets5:amd64 0 as a solution to libkf5textwidgets-dev:amd64 1
  Holding Back libkf5textwidgets-dev:amd64 rather than change libkf5textwidgets5:amd64
Done

> succeeded only once since then.

So they might be just flaky? That is not new (in buildd builds they also just som
> This blocks the Qt transition [2].

*shrugs*. See above.

Regards,

Rene


Reply to: