Bug#918499: libreoffice: fails with 'ERROR 4 forking process'
On Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 08:21:36PM -0500, David Zelinsky wrote:
> > No, you didn't.
>
> Yes, I did. If you think something may have gone wrong with it, then
> you might tell me that. But if you think I'm lying, you're wrong.
I just said you didn't do a upgrade _recently_ because, see
below - purely based on looking at your versions.
> And yet, when I do 'apt upgrade libreoffice' it tells me this is most
> recent version.
1:6.1.3-2? Impossible. Testing got 1:6.1.4-1 long ago, and now has
1:6.1.4-3.
See https://packages.qa.debian.org/libr/libreoffice.html
Similar with other old versions of yours.
Maybe out of date mirror?
> >> libreoffice worked fine, but now fails to start. From the menu,
> >
> > My laptop is runnig testing, too and this worked and works.
>
> OK. Are you saying you're having trouble replicating my problem?
Yes. No problem at all for weeks.
> >> nothing happens. From command line, it fails with the subject error:
> >>
> >> % libreoffice
> >
> > And this works fine.
>
> Riffing on your first comment, if a package works for one person, that
> is not necessarily proof that it doesn't have a problem. Again, I was
True, but given how long these versios are in testing as of now if it
was a general or a problem experienced often problem the report would
have come far sooner..
> I have no idea what this means. I did not explictly put OpenJDK 8 "in
> the config". As I said, I'm not a Debian developer, and I don't spend
> all my time looking at all the config files on my system (though I do
> look at a number of them).
OK, but LO uses Java at parts. (It looks for /usr/bin/java.
Here:
rene@frodo:~/.config/libreoffice$ grep -r java *
4/user/config/javasettings_Linux_X86_64.xml:<java
xmlns="http://openoffice.org/2004/java/framework/1.0"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
4/user/config/javasettings_Linux_X86_64.xml:<javaInfo xsi:nil="false"
vendorUpdate="2013-05-02" autoSelect="true">
4/user/config/javasettings_Linux_X86_64.xml:<location>file:///usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64</location>
4/user/config/javasettings_Linux_X86_64.xml:</javaInfo>
4/user/config/javasettings_Linux_X86_64.xml:</java>
But in my experience it notices default changes and updates the path...
Apparently not, apparently only when the old version is gone...
And your reportbug-generated info shows this shows you have
ii default-jre [java6-runtime] 2:1.10-67
installed
default-jdk | 2:1.11-71 | testing | amd64, arm64, armel,
armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x
and this since November (ok, -70 since November).
So, please, do a upgrade. With a clean, current testing.
Then let's see further.
Regards,
Rene
Reply to: