Re: suspicious dependency requirement of new backported libreoffice version
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018 at 02:15:54PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jul 2018, rene@debian.org wrote:
>
> > > It's said that such requirement (">") is likely to be a mistake. Is
> > > this a problem?
> >
> > No, it's not.
>
> It normally is, you use either ">=" or ">>".
Package: libreoffice-core
Architecture: alpha amd64 arm64 armel armhf hppa i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 m68k mips mipsel mips64 mips64el powerpc powerpcspe ppc64 ppc64el s390 s390x sparc sparc64
Depends: fontconfig,
fonts-opensymbol,
libreoffice-common (>> ${base-version}),
[...]
Checking facts helps. Thanks.
Regards,
Rene
Reply to: