[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#853149: marked as done (Extension Manager: exception in synchronize)

Your message dated Mon, 30 Jan 2017 19:29:10 +0100
with message-id <20170130182910.GX24701@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#853149: Extension Manager: exception in synchronize
has caused the Debian Bug report #853149,
regarding Extension Manager: exception in synchronize
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
853149: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=853149
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: libreoffice-base
Version: 4.3.3-2+deb8u5

After an update I found that LibreOffice did not start anymore. It gave
an error dialog saying:

Extension Manager:
exception in synchronize

After searching the web I found that this might happen if the user
profile is defunct (that was not the case) or the Extention Manager has
no access to some of the shared library locations:

I found that including all rX on the following directories solved the bug.

user@pudding:/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/lightproof_en/pythonpath$
ls -l
total 44
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  4078 May 15  2014
lightproof_handler_lightproof_en.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14966 May 15  2014 lightproof_impl_lightproof_en.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 13965 May 15  2014 lightproof_lightproof_en.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   260 May 15  2014 lightproof_opts_lightproof_en.py
drwxr-x--- 2 root root  4096 Jan 24 10:58 __pycache__
user@pudding:/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/lightproof_en/pythonpath$
sudo chmod a+rX __pycache__/
user@pudding:/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/lightproof_en/pythonpath$
cd __pycache__/
user@pudding:/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/lightproof_en/pythonpath/__pycache__$
ls -l
total 28
-rw-r----- 1 root root  4938 Jan 24 10:58
lightproof_handler_lightproof_en.cpython-34.pyc
-rw-r----- 1 root root 14624 Jan 24 10:58
lightproof_impl_lightproof_en.cpython-34.pyc
-rw-r----- 1 root root   435 Jan 24 10:58
lightproof_opts_lightproof_en.cpython-34.pyc
user@pudding:/usr/lib/libreoffice/share/extensions/lightproof_en/pythonpath/__pycache__$
sudo chmod a+rX *

After this it still did not work, I also changed:

user@pudding:/var/spool/libreoffice/uno_packages/cache$ ls -l
total 4
drwxr-x--- 2 root root 4096 Jan 24 10:58 uno_packages
user@pudding:/var/spool/libreoffice/uno_packages/cache$ sudo chmod a+rX *

Then it worked. I did not try to undo the first change.

I'm using repos:
deb http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/ jessie main contrib non-free
deb-src http://ftp.nl.debian.org/debian/ jessie main contrib non-free

deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main contrib non-free
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main contrib non-free

deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main contrib non-free

Yours,


Tjeerd

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 06:12:03PM +0100, Tjeerd Pinkert wrote:
> I'm sorry, this is my fault, realised only after sending it should have
> been another package, would have chosen libreoffice-common or -core I
> think, still wrong, -base sounds like it (in Dutch) but is not :~

Same in German :). But even in english "base" is used as that ("base of"), so
not surprising. You're not the first one and won't be the last :)

> > So it's ok. (And normal files don't need to be +x)
> 
> X is not x. Interesting that the clean install is OK.

true, but it ends up as the same if root as "owning user" has already +x,
which was the case in your second case (and a noop in the first case.) afaics.
Admittedly, seldomly - if ever - needed +X :)

> > In any case, I can't see any bug in any of the involving packages.
> 
> OK, I accept your verdict, thank you for the efforts, my excuses for the
> false report.

OK.

Closing then as you suggest yourself.

Regards,

Rene

--- End Message ---
Reply to: