[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#870070: Debian 9.1 stretch: LibreOffice Writer crashes at startup



tag 870070 - moreinfo
reassign 870070 src:linux
forcemerge 865303 870070
thanks

Hi,

On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 07:14:04PM +0200, Carmelo C wrote:
>    "gdb --args /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin --writer"
>    "run"
>    "bt full"

Thread 1 "soffice.bin" received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.                                                                                                             
0xa969df95 in _expand_stack_to(unsigned char*) () from /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-i386/jre/lib/i386/server/libjvm.so                                                           
(gdb) bt full                                                                                                                                                                   
#0  0xa969df95 in _expand_stack_to(unsigned char*) () from /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-i386/jre/lib/i386/server/libjvm.so                                                       
No symbol table info available.                                                                                                                                                 
#1  0xa96a07a4 in os::Linux::manually_expand_stack(JavaThread*, unsigned char*) ()                                                                                              
   from /usr/lib/jvm/java-8-openjdk-i386/jre/lib/i386/server/libjvm.so                                                                                                          
No symbol table info available.
[...]

There we go. It's that bug.

Somewhere in the kernel bugs is the boot command line to disable the security fix
as a workaround. Or install the original stretch (-2) kernel.

Reassigning to the kernel. Next time please check whether a bug already is reported.

You also might want to try running amd64 instead of an architecture already quite dead
in the last decade.

Regards,

Rene


Reply to: