[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#847572: Package: libreoffice - crash on start



severity 847572 important
tag 847572 + moreinfo
found 847572 1:4.3.3-2+deb8u5
thanks

Hi,

On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 04:11:51PM +0100, Le Garage Numérique wrote:
>    Package: libreoffice
> 
>    debian reportbug enclosed.

The reportbug thing is thought as the actual mail contents to that
Package:, Version: etc take effect.
(But in this case maybe, given that then the BTS doesn't see the overinflated
bug severity it's probably good that you did it the way you did ;)...)
 
>    Thanks for any help..

Mmh, I am quite sure you didn't mean it this way - but this is a bug tracking
system - not a support forum or a ticketing system... ;)

>Package: libreoffice                                                          
>Version: 1:4.3.3-2+deb8u5                                                      >Severity: grave                                                                >Tags: upstream                                                                
>Justification: renders package unusable  

I'd argue this is overinflated severity.... I am quite sure it doesn't
happen for everyone.

> I have problem with libreoffice crashing on start.

Always? Or in which cases? See below.

> # apt-cache policy xserver-xorg-video-intel
> xserver-xorg-video-intel:
>   Install????: 2:2.99.917+git20161105-1~bpo8+1
>   Candidat??: 2:2.99.917+git20161105-1~bpo8+1
>  Table de version??:
>  *** 2:2.99.917+git20161105-1~bpo8+1 0
>         100 http://http.debian.net/debian/ jessie-backports/main amd64 Packages
>         100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
>      2:2.21.15-2+b2 0
>         500 http://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian/ jessie/main amd64 Packages
> [/code]

And with plain jessie?

Bugs only appearing if you leave jessie and have backports are not really
right here; this BTS is not about bpo bugs..

> I debug libreoffice using --backtrace option, here is gdbtrace.log:

And with libreoffice-dbg installed so one gets useful infos instead of ??'s?

> [code]
> warning: Currently logging to gdbtrace.log.  Turn the logging off and on to
> make the new setting effective.
> [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
> Using host libthread_db library "/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libthread_db.so.1".
> [New Thread 0x7fffe7c8c700 (LWP 2548)]
> [New Thread 0x7fffe1615700 (LWP 2549)]
> [New Thread 0x7fffe0e14700 (LWP 2550)]
> [New Thread 0x7fffdb586700 (LWP 2551)]
> [New Thread 0x7fffd9930700 (LWP 2552)]
> [New Thread 0x7fffc68c3700 (LWP 2553)]
> [New Thread 0x7fffc558f700 (LWP 2556)]
> [Thread 0x7fffc558f700 (LWP 2556) exited]
> 
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x00007ffff45139f5 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libsvtlo.so
> #0  0x00007ffff45139f5 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libsvtlo.so
> #1  0x00007ffff4513cff in TabBar::Resize() () from
> /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libsvtlo.so
[...]

Here e.g. #0 misses info...

But anyway, googling for "TabBar::Resize crash libreoffice" gives me
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123710

Can you try with -dbg and/or confirm the stuff mentioned in that bug?
(the profile removal stuff, TabBar::ImplShowPage) etc. Maybe even test
with LO from bpo.

Is it with ODGs as described above?

Regards,

Rene


Reply to: