[nlpsolver] 09/13: Imported Debian patch 0.9~beta1-8
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
rene pushed a commit to branch master
in repository nlpsolver.
commit 9fd51f4cdfb6a2f6da273196bf4a5755d61c95c9
Author: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
Date: Fri Feb 24 18:58:05 2012 +0000
Imported Debian patch 0.9~beta1-8
---
debian/changelog | 6 ++++++
debian/control | 1 +
debian/rules | 2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 57c4d28..5632b81 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+nlpsolver (0.9~beta1-8) experimental; urgency=low
+
+ * update for gone basis-link in LO 3.5
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org> Fri, 24 Feb 2012 18:58:05 +0000
+
nlpsolver (0.9~beta1-7) unstable; urgency=low
* use default-jdk (closes: #642755)
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 51ca8d5..2fcbb78 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ Priority: extra
Maintainer: Debian LibreOffice Maintainers <debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org>
Uploaders: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50~), unzip, default-jdk, libreoffice-dev, ant | ant1.7, ant-optional | ant1.7-optional, libreoffice-java-common
+Build-Conflicts: libreoffice-common (<< 1:3.5.0~)
Standards-Version: 3.8.4
Package: libreoffice-nlpsolver
diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules
index bc92dd3..42a98e2 100755
--- a/debian/rules
+++ b/debian/rules
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
# Uncomment this to turn on verbose mode.
#export DH_VERBOSE=1
-ANT_FLAGS=-Dplatforms.JDK_1.5.home=/usr/lib/jvm/default-java -Doffice.program.dir=/usr/lib/libreoffice/basis-link -Dsplit.ure=/usr/lib/ure -Dsplit.install=/usr/lib/libreoffice/basis-link/program
+ANT_FLAGS=-Dplatforms.JDK_1.5.home=/usr/lib/jvm/default-java -Doffice.program.dir=/usr/lib/libreoffice -Dsplit.ure=/usr/lib/ure -Dsplit.install=/usr/lib/libreoffice/program
%:
dh $@
--
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-openoffice/nlpsolver.git
Reply to: