[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#803573: marked as done (libreoffice-common: adding Conflicts against old openoffice.org transitional packages?)

Your message dated Mon, 4 Apr 2016 17:38:13 +0200 (CEST)
with message-id <74816438.81272491.1459784293715.JavaMail.root@zimbra51-e8.priv.proxad.net>
and subject line Re: Bug #803573 - libreoffice-common: adding Conflicts against old openoffice.org transitional packages?
has caused the Debian Bug report #803573,
regarding libreoffice-common: adding Conflicts against old openoffice.org transitional packages?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
803573: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803573
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: libreoffice-common
Version: 1:5.0.3~rc1-2
Severity: wishlist

Hi Rene,

what do you think about adding Conflicts against the old openoffice.org*
transitional packages? They were last seen in wheezy, and adding
Conflicts would ensure removal of these obsolete transitional packages
from long grown systems. The successors are already installed.


Andreas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hello,

Andreas Beckmann, Sat, 31 Oct 2015 14:58:05 +0100
> what do you think about adding Conflicts against the old openoffice.org*
> transitional packages? They were last seen in wheezy, and adding
> Conflicts would ensure removal of these obsolete transitional packages
> from long grown systems. The successors are already installed.

OpenOffice is not in Debian. Add this constraint has no meaning now. So I close this bug.

Regards,

-- 
Stéphane Aulery

--- End Message ---
Reply to: