Bug#807601: libreoffice-core and libreoffice-evolution still depend on libgtk2.0-0
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 09:04:55PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > Binary file libevoablo.so matches
>
> And this is the evolution ab thingy. Probably depending on gtk2 because
> of evolution (which also changed). I mean, it doesn't use gtk directly afaics:
>
> (sid)rene@frodo ..ta2/connectivity/source/drivers/evoab2 % grep -r gtk_ *
> 1 (sid)rene@frodo ..ta2/connectivity/source/drivers/evoab2 %
libebook is (forgot to mention that in my last mail) dlopen()'ed anyway and
a build says this:
pkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was not linked against libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols)
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was not linked against libucbhelper.so (it uses none of the library's symbols)
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was not linked against libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols)
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was not linked against libfreetype.so.6 (it uses none of the library's symbols)
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was not linked against libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols)
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was not linked against libfontconfig.so.1 (it uses none of the library's symbols)
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was not linked against libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols)
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was not linked against libatk-1.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols)
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was not linked against libcairo.so.2 (it uses none of the library's symbols)
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was not linked against libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols)
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was not linked against libpango-1.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols)
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was not linked against libfilelo.so (it uses none of the library's symbols)
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: package could avoid a useless dependency if debian/libreoffice-evolution/usr/lib/libreoffice/program/libevoablo.so was not linked against libgio-2.0.so.0 (it uses none of the library's symbols)
# dpkg-shlibdeps "in practice" always will look for this in
so we probably don't need a gtk linkage at all there.
Regards,
Rene
Reply to: