[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[libreoffice] 01/03: build-depend on libwps-dev (>= 0.4.2)



This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

rene pushed a commit to branch debian-experimental-5.1
in repository libreoffice.

commit 79e79be98625e348d40644d75427ce5426cc3ebb
Author: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
Date:   Fri Oct 9 20:41:47 2015 +0200

    build-depend on libwps-dev (>= 0.4.2)
---
 changelog | 2 +-
 control   | 4 ++--
 rules     | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/changelog b/changelog
index 25b970a..32a2f03 100644
--- a/changelog
+++ b/changelog
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-libreoffice (1:5.1.0~alpha1~git20151006-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+libreoffice (1:5.1.0~alpha1~git20151009-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
 
   * New upstream snapshot
 
diff --git a/control b/control
index 670cde4..50ce266 100644
--- a/control
+++ b/control
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ Build-Depends: ant (>= 1.7.0) [!mips64eb],
                libvlc5,
                libwpd-dev (>= 0.10),
                libwpg-dev (>= 0.3),
-               libwps-dev (>= 0.4),
+               libwps-dev (>= 0.4.2),
                libx11-dev,
                libxaw7-dev,
                libxext-dev,
@@ -4531,7 +4531,7 @@ Depends: ant (>= 1.7.0),
          libvlc5,
          libwpd-dev (>= 0.10),
          libwpg-dev (>= 0.3),
-         libwps-dev (>= 0.4),
+         libwps-dev (>= 0.4.2),
          libx11-dev,
          libxaw7-dev,
          libxext-dev,
diff --git a/rules b/rules
index 9e1ed69..6769133 100755
--- a/rules
+++ b/rules
@@ -1175,7 +1175,7 @@ ifeq "$(USE_EXTERNAL_CXXLIBS)" "y"
 	BUILD_DEPS += , libmythes-dev (>= 2:1.2)
   endif
   ifneq (,$(filter libwps, $(SYSTEM_STUFF)))
-	BUILD_DEPS += , libwps-dev (>= 0.4)
+	BUILD_DEPS += , libwps-dev (>= 0.4.2)
   endif
   ifneq (,$(filter libwpg, $(SYSTEM_STUFF)))
 	BUILD_DEPS += , libwpg-dev (>= 0.3)

-- 
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-openoffice/libreoffice.git


Reply to: