[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[libreoffice] 02/03: add missing Replaces: for /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/ure, back again in ure



This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.

rene pushed a commit to branch debian-experimental-5.0
in repository libreoffice.

commit 554ae53b44052cd96134f223243edba9b8138aa4
Author: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
Date:   Fri Apr 17 19:15:02 2015 +0200

    add missing Replaces: for /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/ure, back again in ure
---
 control        | 2 +-
 control.ure.in | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/control b/control
index d66dbf5..3ff6af9 100644
--- a/control
+++ b/control
@@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@ Architecture: alpha amd64 arm64 armel armhf hppa i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreeb
 Depends: uno-libs3 (= ${ure:Version}), ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}
 Suggests: java5-runtime
 Conflicts: cli-uno-bridge (<< 1:3.0.0~dev300m22)
-Replaces: libreoffice-common (<< 1:4.1.2~),
+Replaces: libreoffice-common (<< 1:4.4.0),
           libreoffice-java-common (<< 1:3.0.0~dev300m12)
 Breaks: libreoffice-core (<< 1:4.1.2~), openoffice.org-core (<< 1:3.3~)
 Description: LibreOffice UNO runtime environment
diff --git a/control.ure.in b/control.ure.in
index bf884f5..2e054c4 100644
--- a/control.ure.in
+++ b/control.ure.in
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Architecture: %OOO_ARCHS%
 Depends: uno-libs3 (= ${ure:Version}), ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}
 Suggests: java5-runtime
 Conflicts: cli-uno-bridge (<< 1:3.0.0~dev300m22)
-Replaces: libreoffice-java-common (<< 1:3.0.0~dev300m12), libreoffice-common (<< 1:4.1.2~)
+Replaces: libreoffice-java-common (<< 1:3.0.0~dev300m12), libreoffice-common (<< 1:4.4.0)
 Breaks: openoffice.org-core (<< 1:3.3~), libreoffice-core (<< 1:4.1.2~)
 Description: LibreOffice UNO runtime environment
  The Uno Runtime Environment (URE) is the well-known UNO component model

-- 
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-openoffice/libreoffice.git


Reply to: