Bug#799440: myspell-* and hunspell-*: error when trying to install together
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 01:40:52PM +0000, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:45:04AM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> > this concerns a whole list of myspell-X and hunspell-X packages, but I am
> > filing this bug only against hunspell-af. Here is the complete list:
>
> I was kinda looking for this bug, actually. It's somewhat difficult to
> find out everything when you have a so large number of packages.
> Anyway, I truly expected some less...
>
>
> [re-sorting the list]
> > hunspell-af_myspell-af
> > hunspell-en-gb_myspell-en-gb
> > hunspell-en-za_myspell-en-za
> > hunspell-it_myspell-it
> > hunspell-sw_myspell-sw
> > hunspell-th_myspell-th
>
> These come from src:openoffice.org-dictionaries, which I want to somehow
> remove, so I added transitive packages + breaks/replaces for them.
>
> > hunspell-sl_myspell-sl
>
> This one is orphaned, and the source contains only the hunspell
> patterns. So, I decided to take it over.
> Added a transitional package and breaks/replaces here too.
Note that both contain the same patterns and words. No upstream watch, so
better tracked from libreoffice.
> > hunspell-hrr_myspell-hr
>
> Here there is a typo: hrr → hr. I corrected it, but I'll just ignore
> the conseguences since this package existed only for one day...
> (it fits in the section below)
These also contain the same patterns and words. Seems OK to disable it in
lo-dicts.
> > hunspell-el_myspell-el-gr
Same aff file in current versions, so it is indeed a myspell dict. dic
files are different, but I cannot really compare. lo dict seems however,
based in an old 0.7 version, while myspell-el-gr contains 0.8 (and there is
a 0.9 upstream version waiting). Seems OK to disable it in lo-dicts.
> > hunspell-et_myspell-et.
Same contents in both. OK to disable it in lo-dicts.
> > hunspell-pt_myspell-pt-br
BTW, shouldn't hunspell-pt be hunspell-pt-br?
Both hunspell-pt and myspell-pt-br contain exactly the same dictionary (just
version string in aff file is changed). I am adding a break in myspell-pt-br
against any hunspell-pt-br (not yet hunspell-pt), but I think it is OK to
disable hunspell-pt for now.
> > hunspell-pt-pt_myspell-pt-pt
hunspell-pt-pt dictionary here is an hunspell-only dictionary, so it
deserves it's own package. I will add a break against hunspell-pt-pt in
myspell-pt-pt 20091013-10, but I think hunspell-pt-pt should stay, but
conflicting with myspell-pt-pt (<=20091013-10) and replacing it. Once it
is minimaly tested in Debian I can make myspell-pt-pt a transitional
package to ensure a smooth transition to hunspell-pt-pt.
Regards,
--
Agustin
Reply to: