[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#773971: SV: Bug#773971: Update: Danish hunspell dictionary version 2.2 - 2014-12-22



[ why are you loosing the Cc so that the answer just goes to me instead of also
to Mattia? Since he'll maintain the catch-all-dicts-not-seperately-packaqged
libreoffice-dictionaries ]

Hi,

On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 05:46:21PM +0000, Esben Aaberg wrote:
>    I'm the release manager of the danich-hunspell-dictionary, and if it's a
>    no-brainer to maintain the .deb packet, I might consider it as a part of
>    the release procedure. (Currently I'm not using the Debian repository, and
>    have no previously experience building deb-packages).
>    Currently the binary oxt-file is our official release point. But we could

If you do it correct (https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/, beginners
totorial here: https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/[1]) why noz?

What is *NOT* ok is some "random" deb coming out of some "randmom" build
sycript instead of a proper source package with debian/rules, .changes etc.

And even then you'd need a "sponor" to upload it since you don't have
the rights to do that. But that can be done.

You can ook how the othe seperately packages dictionaries do it.

Regards,

Rene


Reply to: