[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#771621: libreoffice-common: ProductMajor in versionrc incorrect for 4.4 experimental packages



tag 771621 + moreinfo
tag 771621 + wontfix
tag 771621 + upstream
forwarded 771621 Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com>
thanks

On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 03:58:28PM +1300, Olly Betts wrote:
> ProductMajor=40

What are you needing this for in a "correct" value?

Because as we saw my buildlog showd the correctvalues also I just asked
upstream a few moments ago and got the following:

14:06 <@_rene_> sberg: any idea what can cause 
                https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=771621?
14:07 -!- tobaem [~tobi@unaffiliated/tobaem] has quit [Remote host closed the 
          connection]
14:08 < noelgrandin> _rene_, I seem to remember a commit from a week or two ago 
                     where some MajorVersion MinorVersion stuff was removed
14:09 < noelgrandin> _rene_, I seem to remember a discussion about it happening                      on IRC between mmeeks and tml
14:09 <@sberg> _rene_, d90d47e513f21b07095722559db997fa41d1645e
14:09 < IZBot> core - version ini-file's ProductMajor/Minor are unused - 
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=d90d47e513f21b07095722559db997fa41d1645e
14:10 <@_rene_> that they are unused might be, but it's still wrong, and it's 
                also in -4-4s branch from yesterday :)
14:11 < loircbot> LibreOffice (core) gal.bar.nissan * vcl/quartz/ctlayout.cxx: 
                  fdo#85806: Hebrew and Arabic is not working on MAC
14:11 < IZBot> LibreOffice-graphics stack critical/highest NEW Hebrew and 
               Arabic Is Not Working On MAC 
               https://bugs.libreoffice.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85806
14:11 <@_rene_> sberg: but ok, thanks, will + wontfix it :)
14:13 <@sberg> _rene_, might be interesting to know what the bug submitter 
               wants those values for, though; with our ini-files, there's of 
               course always the danger that something we consider internal 
               (and remove or change at will) is actually read by someone out 
               there in the wild and (mis-)used for their purposes
14:14 <@_rene_> was just writing a reply :)

Said commit is already in master.

-> wontfix, moreinfo

Regards,

Rene


Reply to: