[libreoffice] annotated tag libreoffice_4.3.0-3 updated (d045b44 -> 975b267)
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
rene pushed a change to annotated tag libreoffice_4.3.0-3
in repository libreoffice.
*** WARNING: tag libreoffice_4.3.0-3 was modified! ***
from d045b44 (tag)
to 975b267 (tag)
tagging 972fced0101668850e25ac4fb64539b2990dbca8 (commit)
replaces libreoffice_4.3.0-2
tagged by Rene Engelhard
on Sat Aug 9 09:53:03 2014 +0200
- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
tag libreoffice 1:4.3.0-3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)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=qhca
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Rene Engelhard (3):
don't add libreoffice-avmedia-backend-opengl to control when not built (--disable-gltf)
in any casse internal coinmp for wheezy
debian/libreoffice-base.postrm.in: missing \...
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
from 0d35b4b in any casse internal coinmp for wheezy
adds 972fced debian/libreoffice-base.postrm.in: missing \...
No new revisions were added by this update.
Summary of changes:
changelog | 3 ++-
libreoffice-base.postrm.in | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--
Alioth's /usr/local/bin/git-commit-notice on /srv/git.debian.org/git/pkg-openoffice/libreoffice.git
Reply to: