[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#748434: libreoffice-help-en-us: No graphics in the help.



On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 03:09:39PM +0200, Jacek Sobczak wrote:
>> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Actually I apparently had -style-sifr lying around before I did the tests.
>> >
>> > After  cleaning that up apt-get install libreoffice libreoffice-help-en-us always
>> > installs galaxy. So it should work?
>> >
>> > Did you specify any other theme explicitly or did you install something else
>> > and remove galaxy after it? That also would explain it. (And there's no APT bug at all.)
>>
>> from LO 4.1.6 to 4.2.4. As you can see from the aptitude log below I
>> did it in two steps on the same day. In the log all the LO packages
>
> Why two steps? And how did you upgrade?
>
> apt-get dist-upgrade should have done the right thing...
> (Yes, I tested that.)
>
>> libreoffice-style-tango was removed from my system when I upgraded
> [...]
>> [INSTALL, DEPENDENCIES] libreoffice-style-sifr:amd64
>> [REMOVE, DEPENDENCIES] libreoffice-style-galaxy:amd64
>
> OK, clear.
>
> -sifr installed and -galaxy removed so you ended up with only -sifr -
> which exhibits this because it seems to be incomplete...[1]
>
>> [HOLD] libreoffice-calc:amd64
>> [HOLD] libreoffice-impress:amd64
>> [HOLD] libreoffice-writer:amd64
>
> Why? Did you do apt-get upgrade (which would explain this given they need
> new packages installed) and _only_ then dist-upgrade? This is weird steps.
> (I've seen documentation suggesting that, I still think this is questionable..)
>
>> Will install 11 packages, and remove 7 packages.
>> 8859 kB of disk space will be freed
>> ===============================================================================
>> [REMOVE, NOT USED] libcdr-0.0-0:amd64
>> [REMOVE, NOT USED] libmspub-0.0-0:amd64
>> [REMOVE, NOT USED] libvisio-0.0-0:amd64
> [...]
>> [REMOVE, DEPENDENCIES] libreoffice-draw:amd64
>> [REMOVE, DEPENDENCIES] libreoffice-impress:amd64
>> [REMOVE, DEPENDENCIES] libreoffice-math:amd64
>
> And what did you do here? Or did you in some way enforce this manually?

I did it in two steps because it happened that not all packages were
on the mirror yet when I was upgrading. So in the first instance I
upgraded only those which were available and which I could install
without breaking dependencies. In twenty minutes the rest appeared so
I upgraded them. I use aptitude and normally for upgrades the command
'U' which must be more or less dist-upgrade equivalent. Of course for
the first run I selected the packages to upgrade manually although
without any enforcements.

-- 
Cheers
Jacek


Reply to: