Bug#724391: hunspell: diff for NMU version 1.3.2-6.1
On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 05:20:51PM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Rene Engelhard (rene@debian.org) wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 02:42:15AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > > I've prepared an NMU for hunspell (versioned as 1.3.2-6.1) and
> > > uploaded it to DELAYED/10.
> >
> > NMUing for a wishlist bug???
>
> I've been publishing my plans to debian-devel (see the link in the
> original bug report), and there weren't any objections there to the
> plan.
And -devel is not a must-read (and too time-consuiming).
> > > Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer.
> >
> > Yes, please. inedefinitely. (Or until is is at least important/RC)
>
> So the reason it's wishlist right now is that automake1.9 is still in
> the archive. I can cancel this NMU and wait until automake1.9 is
Please do. (Doesn't really mater, though, see below)
> removed, upgrade the bug severity to serious and then upload an NMU,
> but that seems like a worse order of operations since it leaves
> hunspell in a FTBFS state for some amount of time.
Then you don't need a NMU because I'd do it then (I hope).
Besides that, 99_build_stuff,dpatch actualy is not used so I'll just
do a uploading removing that and the build-depends and migrating the whole
thing away from dpatch...
Regards,
Rene
Reply to: