[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SCM] LibreOffice packaging repository annotated tag, libreoffice_4.0.4-2, updated. libreoffice_4.0.4-2



The annotated tag, libreoffice_4.0.4-2 has been updated
        to  9e80843707ebee719838e349ab0f78113d8d727f (tag)
      from  ce339329e2f01bb8ee67cefb7de943dd37aae395 (which is now obsolete)
   tagging  da3223b0d593a58c54f35c5c55750d7be7b482b8 (commit)
  replaces  libreoffice_4.0.4-1
 tagged by  Rene Engelhard
        on  Wed Jun 19 21:41:37 2013 +0200

- Shortlog ------------------------------------------------------------
tag libreoffice 1:4.0.4-2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
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=S/Sd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Rene Engelhard (8):
      sigh, regen control with binutils change (for subsequentestbase)
      fix JAVA_MAINVER setting to actually set 6 for mips(el) and not for ia64
      build-depend on libc6 (>= 2.17-6) additionally to the binutils
      debian/patches/gcj-safe-jni-h-include.diff: remove bogus -I...
      release libreoffice 1:4.0.4-2
      typo
      better fix for gcj-safe-jni-h-include.diffs -I
      simplify, use findstring (as already in 4.1 branch..)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
LibreOffice packaging repository


Reply to: