[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#611583: marked as done (openoffice.org-emailmerge: unopkg failed)

Your message dated Thu, 16 May 2013 09:53:16 +0000
with message-id <E1Ucus8-0005SM-00@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#706870: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #611583,
regarding openoffice.org-emailmerge: unopkg failed
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
611583: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611583
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: openoffice.org-emailmerge
Version: 1:2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny11
Severity: normal

I do not know how severe this problem is; it may be trivial.  Since
we're getting close to release I thought I'd report it.

It did not prevent the installation of other packages.

On a recent update to a lenny system
<quote>

Setting up openoffice.org-report-builder-bin (1:2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny11) ...
Setting up openoffice.org-filter-mobiledev (1:2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny11) ...
Setting up openoffice.org (1:2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny11) ...
Setting up openoffice.org-emailmerge (1:2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny11) ...
Adding extension /usr/lib/openoffice/program/mailmerge.py...
unopkg failed.
 done.
Setting up openoffice.org-help-en-us (1:2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny11) ...
</quote>

May be related to 513300.
May be ultimately caused by some underlying infrastructure; please
reassign as appropriate.

-- Package-specific info:
Identifier: org.openoffice.legacy.mailmerge.py
  URL: vnd.sun.star.expand:$UNO_SHARED_PACKAGES_CACHE/uno_packages/jFGRBN_/mailmerge.py
  is registered: yes
  Media-Type: application/vnd.sun.star.uno-component;type=Python
  Description: UNO Python Component

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.8
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (50, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-2-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages openoffice.org-emailmerge depends on:
ii  python-uno        1:2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny11 Python interface for OpenOffice.or

openoffice.org-emailmerge recommends no packages.

openoffice.org-emailmerge suggests no packages.

Versions of packages python-uno depends on:
ii  libc6             2.7-18lenny7           GNU C Library: Shared libraries
ii  libgcc1           1:4.3.2-1.1            GCC support library
ii  libstdc++6        4.3.2-1.1              The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii  libstlport4.6ldbl 4.6.2-3.2              STLport C++ class library
ii  openoffice.org-co 1:2.4.1+dfsg-1+lenny11 OpenOffice.org office suite archit
ii  python            2.5.2-3                An interactive high-level object-o
ii  python-central    0.6.11                 register and build utility for Pyt
ii  python2.5         2.5.2-15+lenny1        An interactive high-level object-o

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 1:3.4.0~ooo340m1-7+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package openoffice.org has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/706870

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ansgar Burchardt (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---
Reply to: