[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#366891: marked as done (needs megabytes in $HOME just to test drive)

Your message dated Thu, 16 May 2013 09:53:16 +0000
with message-id <E1Ucus8-0005SM-00@franck.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#706870: Removed package(s) from unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #366891,
regarding needs megabytes in $HOME just to test drive
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
366891: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=366891
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: openoffice.org-common
Version: 2.0.2-2
Severity: wishlist

$ oowriter
$ du -sh .openoffice.org2
3.9M    .openoffice.org2
3.9M just to test drive.

Isn't there something wasteful about copying
imagecache/res_commandimagelist_lc_*  etc. to the user's home directory, and
manipulating such large files?

Let the power users cache so much stuff, wouldn't regular users be
fine with static copies of toolbar images or whatever from /usr?

Anyway, that is 3.9MB is just what accumulated on day one. I bet it grows.

One goes into options and can reduce the memory used for graphics to
"1MB", but that didn't help. But that sort of adjustment up or down
should be left to power users anyway.

Anyway, are you sure you need to cache so much in $HOME by default?

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 1:3.4.0~ooo340m1-7+rm

Dear submitter,

as the package openoffice.org has just been removed from the Debian archive
unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports.  We are sorry
that we couldn't deal with your issue properly.

For details on the removal, please see http://bugs.debian.org/706870

The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal
can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/.

This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is
a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing
ftpmaster@debian.org.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Ansgar Burchardt (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)

--- End Message ---
Reply to: