Re: Integration of a new hunspell dictionary
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 09:21:44AM +0200, Élie Roux wrote:
> >Please do youself. And please NOT as an extension. Look on how
> >the other hunspell-* packages do it properly.
>
> Ok. Is hunspell-dict-ko on wheezy a good example? Or hunspell-kk?
There's no hunspell-dict-ko as a binary package afaics, but only
hunspell-ko. And yes, hunspell-<lang> is right.:
"Naming of Language-specific myspell or hunspell dictionary Packages
myspell dictionary packages must be called myspell-<isocode> and hunspell dictionary packages must be called myspell-<isocode> (<isocode> being the two-digit isocode of the language). Use the myspell prefix only for myspell dicts and the hunspell prefix only for hunspell dicts, using hunspell features.
If there are more dictionaries for a language (e.g. de_DE, de_CH, ..) then the country code can be added to the package name (e.g. myspell-<langcode>-<countrycode>). "
(http://dict-common.alioth.debian.org/dsdt-policy.html)
Regards,
Rene
Reply to: