[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[SCM] LibreOffice packaging repository branch, debian-experimental-3.6, updated. libreoffice_3.6.4_rc1-1-12-gee414d6



The following commit has been merged in the debian-experimental-3.6 branch:
commit ee414d69da2a038fd2eae8d250a5d97fecfa4405
Author: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
Date:   Mon Nov 26 20:13:32 2012 +0100

    fix changelog

diff --git a/changelog b/changelog
index 7b09788..4562527 100644
--- a/changelog
+++ b/changelog
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ libreoffice (1:3.6.4~rc1-2) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
   * debian/control.in:
     - remove obsolete Pre-Depends on ure  (>= 1.5.1+OOo3.1.1-15)
       (by the way closes: #693626)
+  * debian/control.mozilla.in, debian/rules: rename
+    mozilla-libreoffice -> browser-plugin-libreoffice
 
  -- Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>  Mon, 19 Nov 2012 00:36:51 +0100
 
@@ -28,28 +30,14 @@ libreoffice (1:3.6.4~rc1-1) experimental; urgency=low
   * debian/control.in:
     - recommend fonts-liberation instead of ttf-liberation
       (closes: #691949)
-  * debian/control.mozilla.in, debian/rules: rename
-    mozilla-libreoffice -> browser-plugin-libreoffice
   * debian/libreoffice-core.bug-control:
     - report-with: fonts-opensymbol instead of transitional ttf-opensymbol
   * debian/libreoffice-{core,gtk3}.bug-script.in: 
     - find out whether we have Experimental features enabled
 
-<<<<<<< HEAD
  -- Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>  Fri, 16 Nov 2012 22:20:37 +0100
 
 libreoffice (1:3.6.3~rc2-1) experimental; urgency=low
-=======
- -- Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>  Sat, 24 Nov 2012 18:31:33 +0100
-
-libreoffice (1:3.5.4+dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=medium
-
-  * debian/control.in:
-    - remove obsolete Pre-Depends on ure  (>= 1.5.1+OOo3.1.1-15)
-      (by the way closes: #693626)
-  * debian/libreoffice-core.bug-control:
-    - report-with: fonts-opensymbol instead of transitional ttf-opensymbol
->>>>>>> origin/debian-experimental-3.5
 
   * new upstream release candidate
 

-- 
LibreOffice packaging repository


Reply to: