[SCM] LibreOffice packaging repository branch, debian-experimental-3.5, updated. libreoffice_3.5.0_beta2-2-37-g795452b
The following commit has been merged in the debian-experimental-3.5 branch:
commit 795452b1cd2e23e1a5e803976d39b29bacd1183b
Author: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
Date: Wed Jan 11 23:06:23 2012 +0000
remove obsolete cli-uno-bridge Suggests
diff --git a/changelog b/changelog
index 2fc75e9..8c2fc4e 100644
--- a/changelog
+++ b/changelog
@@ -15,13 +15,15 @@ libreoffice (1:3.5.0~beta3-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
uno-libs3 instead
* debian/uno-libs3.symbols:
- use uno-libs3, not ure as dependency
+ * debian/control.ure.in:
+ - remove obsolete cli-uno-bridge Suggests
* merge from ubuntu-precise-3.5:
- add debian multiarch support for Qt4
- no dependencies needed for full builds
+ propagate gb_FULLDEPS
- -- Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org> Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:25:31 +0000
+ -- Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org> Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:05:52 +0000
libreoffice (1:3.5.0~beta2-2) experimental; urgency=low
diff --git a/control b/control
index b621d07..21d4ff8 100644
--- a/control
+++ b/control
@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ Package: ure
Section: libs
Architecture: alpha amd64 armel armhf hppa i386 ia64 mips mipsel powerpc powerpcspe ppc64 s390 s390x sparc kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386
Depends: uno-libs3 (= ${ure:Version}), ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
-Suggests: java5-runtime, cli-uno-bridge
+Suggests: java5-runtime
Conflicts: cli-uno-bridge (<< 1:3.0.0~dev300m22)
Replaces: libreoffice-java-common (<< 1:3.0.0~dev300m12)
Breaks: openoffice.org-core (<< 1:3.3~)
diff --git a/control.ure.in b/control.ure.in
index 6471caa..feec5cf 100644
--- a/control.ure.in
+++ b/control.ure.in
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ Section: libs
Architecture: %OOO_ARCHS%
Depends: uno-libs3 (= ${ure:Version}), ${shlibs:Depends},
${misc:Depends}
-Suggests: java5-runtime, cli-uno-bridge
+Suggests: java5-runtime
Conflicts: cli-uno-bridge (<< 1:3.0.0~dev300m22)
Replaces: libreoffice-java-common (<< 1:3.0.0~dev300m12)
Breaks: openoffice.org-core (<< 1:3.3~)
--
LibreOffice packaging repository
Reply to: