Bug#613389: libreoffice: terminate called after throwing an instance of 'com::sun::star::lang::WrappedTargetRuntimeException'
There were 2 points in my bug report.
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:40:06 +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 03:24:37PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 02:58:09PM +0100, Christophe TROESTLER wrote:
> > > Package: libreoffice
> > > Version: 1:3.3.0-2
> > > Severity: grave
> >
> > How does this (if you would have a correct uptodate system). But
> > what did you do a safe-upgrade from? testing doesn't have libreoffice
> > and your apt prefers testing.
>
> Oh, and besides that, you mmaybe want to sanity-check your Version; stanzas.
> 1:3.3.0-2 is wrong, since if at all, the bug is in 3.2.1~rc1-2. And 3.3.0-2
> is unfixable anyways if a bug was there and it's superseded already.
One of the point is that, pulling some packages to version
3.2.1~rc1-2, it should have pulled all dependent packages to the same
version. As I mentioned, I updated the other packages by hand but
IMHO, the dependencies should have taken care of that for me.
I do not buy your "argument" about not mixing testing and unstable.
The preference file is pretty useless if one is meant to follow only
one branch. To me, the branch only speaks about the quality of the
software one can expects (from unstable, one expects that it may
break, that's why I sent a report). The dependency system should take
care that the right packages are updated. For example,
libreoffice-report-builder depends on libreoffice-core meaning that
any version of the latter will do. If a constraint on the version is
required, this should be mentioned.
The second point of the report is that, even after manually upgrading
all packages to their 3.2.1~rc1-2 version, libreoffice broke with the
given exception when trying to open a file. I will send you my former
.libreoffice directory privately.
Thanks for taking the time to reply to me,
C.
Reply to: