Bug#513746:

[Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>]

Hi,

On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:27:51PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > I noticed that the OOo splash in OpenSuse 11.3 looks ok on 16bpp...
> 
> SuSEs version?
> They use an other image. (And they also convert the image to 24bpp anyways,
> so it probably just works by chance).

As we are there, I just compared ours and SuSEs files (based on
OpenOffice_org-branding-openSUSE-3.2.1-2.2.src.rpm)

$ file /usr/lib/openoffice/program/intro.bmp
/usr/lib/openoffice/program/intro.bmp: PC bitmap, Windows 3.x format, 551 x 366 x 24
										  ^^
$ file OpenOffice_org-branding-openSUSE-11.3-intro.bmp
OpenOffice_org-branding-openSUSE-11.3-intro.bmp: PC bitmap, Windows 3.x format, 440 x 286 x 24
                                                                                            ^^
and:

$ file ~/OpenOffice.org/OOO320_m19/ooo_custom_images/nologo/introabout/intro.png
/home/rene/OpenOffice.org/OOO320_m19/ooo_custom_images/nologo/introabout/intro.png: PNG image data, 551 x 366, 8-bit/color RGB, non-interlaced

$ file OpenOffice_org-branding-openSUSE-11.3-intro.png
OpenOffice_org-branding-openSUSE-11.3-intro.png: PNG image data, 440 x 286, 8-bit/color RGB, non-interlaced

> We take the images directly out of OOo source and convert them to bmp
> (oosplash only accepts 24bpp bmps, or did that get fixed in ooo-build in the
> meanwhile - should try?) using the following:

And indeed, it still doesn't accept the png for the splash.
And we and SuSE use (basically) the same ooo-build version.

Grüße/Regards,

René
-- 
 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70
   `-   Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70