On Wednesday, 21. April 2010 Rene Engelhard wrote: > tag 578685 + unreproducible ^^^^ Too bad. > [...] > > Crash Scenario 1: > Works for me. Asks me > [...] > > Crash Scenario 2: > Works for me, too (shows "Personal"). > [...] Okay, I'll try harder to find out what the problem might be. I suspect that it has something to do with X forwarding (although the Problem *should not* arise under Xephyr then). > [...] > > Error messages (same in both cases, all with same process number): > There is no process number in there, it's a line number in gtype.c of glib... Sorry for being unclear on this. The error messages are preceeded by (process: xxxxx), which I cut in my bug report. I should have left this intact. I'll test this again ASAP on a Squeeze machine with a terminal attached (weekend hopefully). Best regards, Christian -- christian hilberg * computer science email@example.com * unix user group siegen * The best defense against logic is ignorance. *
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.