[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#569124: marked as done (openoffice.org-common: Debian menu xpm icons look broken)

Your message dated Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:22:40 +0100
with message-id <20100212122239.GC28720@rene-engelhard.de>
and subject line [rene@debian.org: Re: Broken xpm icons]
has caused the Debian Bug report #569124,
regarding openoffice.org-common: Debian menu xpm icons look broken
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
569124: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569124
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: openoffice.org-common
Version: 1:3.1.1-14
Severity: minor

The following files look nothing like their PNG versions, indeed some
are fully transparent. As a result the icons on the Debian menu look
quite broken and nothing like the FreeDesktop menu. 

/usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/openofficeorg3-*.xpm

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (600, 'unstable'), (550, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages openoffice.org-common depends on:
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0]  1.5.28            Debian configuration management sy
ii  openoffice.org-style-a 1:3.1.1-14        full-featured office productivity 
ii  openoffice.org-style-g 1:3.1.1-14        full-featured office productivity 
ii  openoffice.org-style-t 1:3.1.1-14        full-featured office productivity 
ii  ure                    1.5.1+OOo3.1.1-14 OpenOffice.org UNO runtime environ

Versions of packages openoffice.org-common recommends:
pn  xfonts-mathml                 <none>     (no description available)

Versions of packages openoffice.org-common suggests:
pn  openoffice.org-style-crystal  <none>     (no description available)
pn  openoffice.org-style-hicontra <none>     (no description available)
pn  openoffice.org-style-industri <none>     (no description available)
pn  openoffice.org-style-oxygen   <none>     (no description available)
ii  openoffice.org-style-tango    1:3.1.1-14 full-featured office productivity 

-- debconf information:
  openoffice.org/running:

-- 
bye,
pabs

http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 1:3.1.1-15+squeeze1

Oops, closed the wrong bug. (569167 should have been closed anyway, though,
if the bug is a graphicsmagick bug what Nelsons mail says ]

----- Forwarded message from Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org> -----

Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 13:12:50 +0100
From: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
To: "Nelson A. de Oliveira" <naoliv@debian.org>
Cc: 569167-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Broken xpm icons
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

Version: 1:3.1.1-15+squeeze1

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 05:48:16PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > But doing a simple "convert openofficeorg3-base.png openofficeorg3-base.xpm"
> > (using imagemagick's convert), the .xpm file is properly created (it is like
> > the PNG file, with transparent background).
> 
> OK.
> 
> > It seems that it's only a problem in graphicsmagick maybe?
> > 
> > Tested with imagemagick 7:6.5.8.3-1
> 
> OK. Thanks. The build-dep on imagemagick is there and I just committed
> a addition of graphicsmagick-imagemagick-compat (<< 1.3.9~) to
> Build-Conflicts:

This should be fixed in 3.1.1-15+squeeze1[1] (though without the Build-Conflicts
above because I needed to do t-s instead of t-p-u sid which would have allowed
me to add this additionally to the security fixes) because that one's built
with imagemagick.

I'll add the build-conflicts then for the 3.2 packages.

Grüße/Regards,

René

[1] which I just uploaded to testing-security


----- End forwarded message -----
Grüße/Regards,

René

--- End Message ---
Reply to: