Bug#544621: openoffice.org-common: unopkg.bin can't find libjvmaccessgcc3.so.3
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 10:43:23AM +0800, Michael Deegan wrote:
> > And why did you do that NOW? 3.0.1-9 is LOOOONG gone. >
> Well, not as long gone as 2.4.1. :P
Well, 2.4.1 isn't gone, it's in stable :P
> If it makes you more comfortable, I get a similar result when upgrading
> from the 2.4.1 in stable:
Bvut only if you "upgrade" via apt-get install, a dist-upgrade works last
time I tried it when a similar bug came....
> > ARGH. If you use unstable or testing (see below), why not just use dist-upgrade
> > instead of apt-get'ing every package?
>
> Because a dist-upgrade wants to uninstall a bunch of KDE packages (thanks
> to xine), and install the new dependencies of held packages.
Either you use stable or you use testing. Live with it, and wtf
don't you just use lenny-backports for OOo? That even is more up-to-date
then squeeze....
> is effectively all lenny with selected bits of squeeze. I'm pretty sure the
Why? -> backports.
> IMHO mixed distributions are sometimes good for catching missing
> dependencies.
And also for bogus reports :-).
That's why I try people to have sane systems...
In any case, what we could do is making openoffice.org-common depend on
a) ure, not problematic
b) openoffice.org-core. That would result in a circular dependency because
-core obviously depends on -common. APT will break that up and install either
one first and that won't help us in this case when the "wrong" one first
Grüße/Regards,
Rene
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70
`- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70
Reply to: