Re: Bug#529473: ITP: openoffice.org-altsearch -- Alternative Find and Replace for Writer
Rene Engelhard dixit:
>Actually no, it's not. And it has some RC bugs right now even from
>quickly looking at it
Thanks for looking at it, still.
>- Depends: openoffice.org-common
>
>"for Writer". Please depend on writer. (which in turn depends on -common anyway)
Okay. I only looked for which package unopkg was in.
>- why do you need unzip? Isn't used anywhere.
Oops. Leftover from the first try, thanks for catching.
>- s/licence/license/
No, that is the oversea barbarian dialect. I try to get as close
to the Queen’s English as I can, with it being my third natural
language.
>- please copy the maintainer scripts from already existing extensions.
There are any? I failed to find them – but maybe I just didn’t
have the right search terms for the 23+k packages…
>- Why do you claim to be a an example for packaging extensions when there
> are alredy others in Debian?
See above.
>- Looks like #348935 could also be closed with your upload?
I don’t know about that; the extension does not seem to show up in Calc.
I’ll address most of the points you raised later, then.
But I’d like you to name me an example of an existing OOo
extension package to look at for reference, since I failed
to find any.
bye,
//mirabilos
--
“It is inappropriate to require that a time represented as
seconds since the Epoch precisely represent the number of
seconds between the referenced time and the Epoch.”
-- IEEE Std 1003.1b-1993 (POSIX) Section B.2.2.2
Reply to: