[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#525245: openoffice.org: OO.o should recommend/suggest xfonts-mathml



found 525245 1:3.0.1-7
severity 525245 wishlist
tag 525245 + moreinfo
thanks

Hi,

Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> OO.o neither recommends nor suggests xfonts-mathml. Without that package documents using the common Symbol font 
> (say for mathematical equations) won't display properly. 

Do you have examples? Maybe documents? Is that "alien" formats?
Because OOo should use OpenSymbol, and that is even depended on (as you
also need it for bullets etc.)

> ii  openoffice.org-base    1:3.0.1-7~bpo50+1 OpenOffice.org office suite - data
> ii  openoffice.org-calc    1:3.0.1-7~bpo50+1 OpenOffice.org office suite - spre
> ii  openoffice.org-core    1:3.0.1-7~bpo50+1 OpenOffice.org office suite archit
> ii  openoffice.org-draw    1:3.0.1-7~bpo50+1 OpenOffice.org office suite - draw
> ii  openoffice.org-filter- 1:2.4.1+dfsg-1    Mobile Devices Filters for OpenOff
> ii  openoffice.org-impress 1:3.0.1-7~bpo50+1 OpenOffice.org office suite - pres
> ii  openoffice.org-java-co 1:3.0.1-7~bpo50+1 OpenOffice.org office suite Java s
> ii  openoffice.org-math    1:3.0.1-7~bpo50+1 OpenOffice.org office suite - equa
> ii  openoffice.org-officeb 1:3.0.1-7~bpo50+1 OpenOffice.org Office Bean
> ii  openoffice.org-report- 1:2.4.1+dfsg-1    OpenOffice.org Report Builder exte
> ii  openoffice.org-writer  1:3.0.1-7~bpo50+1 OpenOffice.org office suite - word

Not that it's related, but mixup?
(The dependencies afais are correct, though, except maybe for the
report-builder extension, but I don't really want to add conflicts. I think
the -report-builder package should say what it needs - and that's actually
done with the OOo3 packages)

Grüße/Regards,

René
-- 
 .''`.  René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
 `. `'  rene@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
   `-   Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB  7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73




Reply to: